H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kaia Kanepi vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 2-2
Kaia Kanepi and Lourdes Domínguez Lino are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2008 Acapulco fourth round 6-7(1) 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
EST
Age 41
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Kaia Kanepi | 6-7(1) 6-1 6-3 | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | Match data |
| May 16, 2007* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Kaia Kanepi | 6-3 6-3 | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | Match data |
| May 5, 2006* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 6-1 6-4 | Kaia Kanepi | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2006* | Bogota | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 7-5 6-2 | Kaia Kanepi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaia Kanepi | #1,322 | #15 | 2,760 | 1,912 | 261 | 235 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | #1,129 | #40 | 1,305 | 1,674 | 125 | 157 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kaia Kanepi | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #285 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #98 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #390 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #75 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #72 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #52 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #34 | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 25–9 | 73.5% | #19 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 21–10 | 67.7% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #134 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2015 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,655 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #69 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2018 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2019 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #220 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2021 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #73 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #32 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #168 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |