H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Kaia Kanepi vs Shahar Peer H2H: 3-3

Kaia Kanepi and Shahar Peer are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Shahar Peer leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2015 Katowice third round 6-1 6-2.

EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 9, 2015* Katowice WTA 250 R32 Hard Kaia Kanepi #50 6-1 6-2 Shahar Peer #118 Match data
Sep 30, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kaia Kanepi #25 6-3 7-6(5) Shahar Peer #19 Match data
Aug 18, 2010* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kaia Kanepi #34 6-3 6-3 Shahar Peer #18 Match data
Jun 28, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Shahar Peer #16 6-4 7-5 Kaia Kanepi #58 Match data
May 29, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Shahar Peer #17 6-1 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #55 Match data
May 13, 2006* Prague WTA 250 SF Clay Shahar Peer #35 6-3 6-0 Kaia Kanepi #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kaia Kanepi Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4
30 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4
31 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4
33 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4