H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kaia Kanepi vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 3-0

Kaia Kanepi holds a 3–0 lead over Sofia Arvidsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2011 Roland Garros round of 128 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kaia Kanepi
Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Sofia Arvidsson
SWE Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kaia Kanepi #16 7-5 6-1 Sofia Arvidsson #70 Match data May 24, 2011* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Kaia Kanepi #17 6-3 6-4 Sofia Arvidsson #60 Match data Feb 11, 2011* R16 Paris Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Kaia Kanepi #73 3-6 6-3 6-3 Sofia Arvidsson #97 Match data Jan 11, 2008* R16 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Sofia Arvidsson #320 #29 1,380 1,769 114 156 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kaia Kanepi Sofia Arvidsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #437 1,489 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #144 1,475 0 0
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #104 1,482 0 0
20 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0 2004 1–6 14.3% #213 1,433 0 0
21 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0 2005 13–8 61.9% #67 1,598 0 0
22 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0 2006 16–19 45.7% #62 1,536 0 1
23 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0 2007 6–11 35.3% #98 1,507 0 1
24 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0 2008 13–19 40.6% #56 1,536 0 1
25 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1 2009 0–8 0.0% #139 1,456 0 1
26 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,798 0 1 2010 14–16 46.7% #53 1,549 0 1
27 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,861 0 3 2011 16–23 41.0% #78 1,627 0 1
28 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4 2012 27–21 56.2% #41 1,748 0 2
29 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4 2013 6–18 25.0% #120 1,595 0 2
30 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4 2014 0–1 0.0% #263 1,579 0 2
31 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4 2015 0–1 0.0% #320 1,566 0 2
32 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,731 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,761 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kaia Kanepi Sofia Arvidsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 11 6 17 64.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 4 9 13 30.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2010 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 8 15 23 34.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 17 12 29 58.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 5 9 14 35.7% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — 82 95 177 46.3% 25 42 67 37.3% 5 15 20 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's and 206/263 of Sofia Arvidsson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kaia Kanepi Sofia Arvidsson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/7 1.0 2.0 71.6% 50.0% 36.8% 53.8% 23.1% 46.3% 44.3%
21 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7% 2005 3/21 0.7 2.3 62.2% 69.3% 36.4% 56.7% 47.2% 57.1% 49.2%
22 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6% 2006 22/35 3.0 2.4 66.2% 63.7% 45.2% 47.2% 46.4% 57.1% 45.4%
23 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8% 2007 14/17 2.1 1.6 65.3% 55.1% 41.3% 47.3% 55.4% 50.1% 44.2%
24 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8% 2008 24/32 1.4 2.3 68.1% 59.6% 39.8% 47.1% 44.1% 53.2% 45.7%
25 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2% 2009 8/8 0.5 1.3 64.9% 48.9% 40.6% 43.7% 28.9% 45.8% 35.6%
26 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4% 2010 27/30 2.0 2.0 67.2% 61.0% 41.4% 50.7% 43.6% 54.5% 44.8%
27 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8% 2011 38/39 1.6 1.5 66.9% 55.7% 45.7% 45.8% 46.3% 52.1% 41.2%
28 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9% 2012 44/48 1.6 2.1 68.2% 58.5% 45.3% 51.9% 48.4% 54.3% 46.9%
29 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2% 2013 23/24 2.3 1.5 67.1% 56.6% 46.5% 42.6% 46.6% 52.5% 38.8%
30 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0% 2014 1/1 2.0 4.0 64.4% 70.1% 37.8% 61.5% 66.7% 58.7% 33.0%
31 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7% 2015 1/1 1.0 2.0 68.5% 45.9% 47.1% 54.5% — 46.3% 20.0%
32 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2% — 206/270 1.8 1.9 67.1% 58.3% 43.7% 48.0% 45.9% 53.2% 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kaia Kanepi Sofia Arvidsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1497 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1498 103.4 — — — — — +23 — 40.0% -0.90 — — — +0.03 2001 1490 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1476 100.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.05
19 2004 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 2003 1482 105.7 — — — — +57 — — 36.4% 0.00 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.02
20 2005 1527 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.08 2004 1434 102.5 -0.81 -1.09 0.825 45.2% +52 — — 25.0% -1.75 0–2 1–1 — +0.24
21 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 — 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19 2005 1599 123.9 +0.40 +0.57 1.145 52.4% +22 — — 58.7% +0.63 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — +0.92
22 2007 1581 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +17 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.3 +0.10 2006 1536 114.6 +0.33 -0.03 1.057 51.0% +86 -78 +4 42.7% -0.64 5–2 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 103.4 +1.98
23 2008 1761 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -2 -50 — 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.04 2007 1507 107.1 -4.02 -1.30 0.886 47.3% +31 -34 — 35.1% -1.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.06
24 2009 1604 134.2 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 — 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.79 2008 1537 127.3 -1.18 +0.89 0.975 49.2% +65 -106 — 44.6% -0.43 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.15
25 2010 1842 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -58 -100 -165 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -1.00 2009 1457 91.0 -4.02 -2.76 0.657 40.6% +57 — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.46
26 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49 2010 1550 118.4 -1.30 +0.07 0.984 49.7% +24 -80 — 44.3% -0.20 7–3 (70%) 1–3 (25%) 103.7 +0.17
27 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 — 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29 2011 1628 121.1 -2.81 -2.10 0.862 46.6% -43 -25 — 36.0% -0.99 9–3 (75%) 6–4 (60%) 112.3 -0.96
28 2013 1838 132.3 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -37 +75 -164 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19 2012 1748 129.2 -1.39 +2.23 1.026 50.5% -15 -68 -277 53.1% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 +1.06
29 2014 1719 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +38 +81 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89 2013 1595 110.7 -2.33 -3.02 0.816 45.6% +53 -35 -186 28.6% -1.61 4–4 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -1.31
30 2015 1659 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +51 +100 — 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.35 2014 1580 100.9 -3.45 -0.79 0.797 46.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.02
31 2016 1663 113.1 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02 2015 1566 97.6 -0.28 -2.45 0.372 36.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.10
32 2017 1732 125.4 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +33 — — 57.1% -0.14 2–0 — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1777 140.3 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +32 — 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 — — 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 — 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 — 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +24 +4 -153 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.69 — 1770 122.6 -1.79 -0.35 0.932 48.3% +28 -59 -161 41.3% -0.65 40–33 (55%) 25–25 (50%) 108.7 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.