H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Kaja Juvan vs Misaki Doi H2H: 0-1
Misaki Doi holds a 1–0 lead over Kaja Juvan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Misaki Doi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Misaki Doi won the 2022 Adelaide 1 quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2022* | Adelaide 1 | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Misaki Doi | 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | Kaja Juvan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaja Juvan | #140 | #58 | 1,040 | 1,757 | 46 | 56 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kaja Juvan | Misaki Doi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #104 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #100 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #89 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #106 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #596 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #102 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |