H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karin Knapp vs Na Li H2H: 1-0
Karin Knapp holds a 1–0 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karin Knapp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karin Knapp won the 2008 Antwerp semifinal 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2008* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Karin Knapp | 6-4 7-6(5) | Na Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,712 | 103 | 117 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Na Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #147 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 |