H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Karolina Pliskova vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 2-3

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 3–2 lead over Karolina Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Karolina Pliskova leads 2–0 on clay, while Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Pliskova won the 2018 Stuttgart final 7-6(2) 6-4.

CZE Age 34 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 29, 2018* Stuttgart WTA 500 F Clay Karolina Pliskova #6 7-6(2) 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #16 Match data
Sep 7, 2017* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Coco Vandeweghe #22 7-6(4) 6-3 Karolina Pliskova #1 Match data
Apr 28, 2017* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Karolina Pliskova #3 7-6(2) 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #23 Match data
Feb 17, 2016* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #46 7-6(5) 6-1 Karolina Pliskova #14 Match data
Jul 2, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Coco Vandeweghe #47 7-6(5) 6-4 Karolina Pliskova #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Karolina Pliskova #64 #1 6,940 2,041 421 241 63.6% 0 3 0 9 5 17
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karolina Pliskova Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #736 1,491 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 2008 2–1 66.7% #465 1,530 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2009 0–1 0.0% #221 1,521 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2010 0–1 0.0% #212 1,504 0 0 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0
19 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,467 0 0 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0
20 2012 1–6 14.3% #118 1,444 0 0 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0
21 2013 11–15 42.3% #71 1,514 0 1 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2014 44–24 64.7% #23 1,799 0 3 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2015 50–25 66.7% #11 1,813 0 4 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2016 38–19 66.7% #6 1,901 0 6 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2
25 2017 52–18 74.3% #4 1,930 0 9 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2
26 2018 46–21 68.7% #8 1,916 0 11 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2
27 2019 51–16 76.1% #2 1,975 0 15 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2
28 2020 14–8 63.6% #6 1,914 0 16 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2021 35–18 66.0% #4 1,972 0 16 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2
30 2022 21–19 52.5% #31 1,834 0 16 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2023 17–20 45.9% #38 1,759 0 16 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2
32 2024 20–17 54.1% #41 1,777 0 17
34 2026 19–8 70.4% #64 1,879 0 17