H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Karolina Pliskova vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 2-3

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 3–2 lead over Karolina Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Karolina Pliskova won the 2019 Dubai Tennis Championships second round 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karolina Pliskova
Czech Republic Age 34 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karolina Pliskova #5 6-2 3-6 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #30 Match data Feb 20, 2019* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Karolina Pliskova #3 6-4 4-6 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #5 Match data Feb 18, 2017* SF Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Dominika Cibulkova #12 6-2 6-2 Karolina Pliskova #6 Match data Sep 29, 2016* R16 Wuhan Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Dominika Cibulkova #21 7-5 6-3 Karolina Pliskova #17 Match data Jun 26, 2016* F Eastbourne Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Dominika Cibulkova #10 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 Karolina Pliskova #75 Match data Apr 19, 2014* SF Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karolina Pliskova #57 #1 6,940 2,045 430 248 63.4% 0 2 0 9 6 17
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,964 368 265 58.1% 0 0 1 4 3 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karolina Pliskova Dominika Cibulkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #736 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 2–1 66.7% #465 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 0–1 0.0% #221 1,521 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 2010 0–1 0.0% #212 1,504 0 0 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0
19 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,467 0 0 2008 36–26 58.1% #19 1,843 0 0
20 2012 1–6 14.3% #118 1,444 0 0 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,735 0 0
21 2013 11–15 42.3% #71 1,514 0 1 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2014 44–24 64.7% #23 1,800 0 3 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,894 0 1
23 2015 50–25 66.7% #11 1,814 0 4 2012 34–26 56.7% #15 1,790 0 2
24 2016 41–21 66.1% #6 1,895 0 6 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,734 0 3
25 2017 52–18 74.3% #4 1,928 0 9 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,719 0 4
26 2018 48–22 68.6% #8 1,921 0 11 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,756 0 4
27 2019 51–16 76.1% #2 1,979 0 15 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8
28 2020 14–8 63.6% #6 1,916 0 16 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8
29 2021 37–19 66.1% #4 1,969 0 16 2018 28–19 59.6% #25 1,872 0 8
30 2022 21–19 52.5% #31 1,835 0 16 2019 2–9 18.2% #315 1,755 0 8
31 2023 17–20 45.9% #38 1,763 0 16 — — — — — — —
32 2024 20–17 54.1% #41 1,777 0 17 — — — — — — —
34 2026 21–11 65.6% #57 1,855 0 17 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karolina Pliskova Dominika Cibulkova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
19 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 27 18 45 60.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2013 8 8 16 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 18 18 36 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 2014 36 18 54 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 29 15 44 65.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2015 37 19 56 66.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2012 19 17 36 52.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2016 25 13 38 65.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 2013 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 37 12 49 75.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2014 29 17 46 63.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 32 16 48 66.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2015 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2019 34 11 45 75.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2016 37 17 54 68.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
28 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2017 22 15 37 59.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
29 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2018 18 11 29 62.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
30 2022 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2019 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2023 14 14 28 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 15 11 26 57.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 6 5 11 54.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 289 160 449 64.4% 83 56 139 59.7% 58 32 90 64.4% — — — — — 254 185 439 57.9% 72 53 125 57.6% 39 24 63 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 614/678 of Karolina Pliskova's and 558/630 of Dominika Cibulkova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karolina Pliskova Dominika Cibulkova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2007 1/1 5.0 2.0 39.7% 55.2% 50.0% 40.0% 83.3% 52.1% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 2/3 1.5 4.0 54.7% 62.1% 35.7% 28.3% 62.5% 50.0% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 1/1 2.0 3.0 63.1% 65.9% 37.5% 57.1% 25.0% 55.4% 31.7% 2007 23/34 0.3 3.9 62.2% 56.6% 46.2% 51.0% 47.4% 52.3% 45.7%
19 2011 3/3 4.7 2.7 60.4% 63.4% 33.2% 48.5% 33.3% 51.4% 33.2% 2008 56/62 0.8 2.7 68.4% 60.8% 48.3% 54.4% 46.5% 56.7% 46.6%
20 2012 7/7 6.1 2.9 63.3% 66.4% 40.1% 54.0% 42.5% 56.9% 32.6% 2009 36/37 0.6 3.3 67.4% 60.0% 49.3% 52.6% 53.6% 56.4% 46.9%
21 2013 23/26 6.7 3.0 58.1% 72.6% 43.5% 56.8% 43.9% 60.7% 38.6% 2010 50/54 1.1 3.7 63.2% 60.8% 46.2% 53.9% 50.9% 55.6% 43.9%
22 2014 66/68 6.5 2.9 58.8% 71.6% 47.2% 53.4% 43.5% 61.4% 42.8% 2011 53/62 1.1 4.2 56.1% 64.9% 46.5% 54.6% 53.9% 56.8% 48.0%
23 2015 58/75 6.9 3.3 61.3% 72.1% 49.2% 58.3% 52.8% 63.4% 40.3% 2012 52/60 1.5 4.2 54.2% 66.3% 45.8% 50.4% 53.3% 56.4% 48.0%
24 2016 52/62 8.8 2.7 58.4% 75.5% 46.8% 58.8% 45.4% 63.3% 43.9% 2013 45/50 0.9 4.8 60.8% 61.9% 44.4% 53.5% 44.6% 55.1% 45.9%
25 2017 60/70 6.6 2.9 58.6% 74.5% 48.5% 59.7% 46.2% 63.9% 44.3% 2014 51/55 0.8 4.3 66.5% 62.6% 45.5% 57.1% 50.5% 57.0% 47.7%
26 2018 63/70 5.8 3.6 63.6% 69.7% 47.0% 58.1% 46.6% 61.2% 43.4% 2015 24/35 1.0 4.1 67.0% 61.0% 48.2% 53.0% 43.9% 56.6% 43.0%
27 2019 63/67 7.6 3.1 65.9% 74.0% 46.0% 57.9% 48.3% 64.3% 45.1% 2016 67/74 1.0 3.2 66.4% 62.7% 47.5% 54.7% 50.3% 57.8% 48.0%
28 2020 22/22 5.6 4.0 61.4% 70.4% 46.7% 58.2% 46.1% 61.2% 43.7% 2017 46/48 0.8 2.9 66.1% 62.2% 48.0% 55.2% 49.2% 57.4% 45.5%
29 2021 50/56 7.3 5.7 62.3% 70.4% 43.6% 61.3% 46.0% 60.1% 41.8% 2018 45/48 1.1 3.9 65.2% 63.3% 48.4% 55.6% 48.6% 58.1% 44.3%
30 2022 40/40 6.7 5.9 64.1% 67.5% 41.7% 57.9% 48.6% 58.5% 41.2% 2019 10/11 0.9 4.5 66.1% 58.8% 45.1% 54.3% 40.4% 54.2% 38.4%
31 2023 36/37 6.4 4.5 65.1% 69.3% 38.7% 53.3% 49.4% 58.7% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 35/37 7.1 6.9 64.5% 68.0% 42.9% 61.2% 50.7% 59.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 32/33 3.6 5.6 65.3% 66.9% 42.3% 54.1% 52.7% 58.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 614/679 6.7 3.9 62.0% 71.2% 45.3% 57.5% 47.5% 61.3% 42.3% — 558/634 0.9 3.7 63.5% 62.2% 46.9% 54.0% 49.6% 56.5% 46.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karolina Pliskova Dominika Cibulkova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2007 1491 98.9 -2.80 -7.65 0.953 48.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1531 101.3 -0.28 -0.31 0.643 42.7% — +24 — 57.1% -0.71 1–0 — — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1522 99.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.16 2006 1506 100.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 2–0 1–1 — +0.22
18 2010 1504 97.5 -1.06 +0.20 0.710 44.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.13 2007 1606 123.4 -2.75 +1.36 0.957 49.0% -43 +45 — 48.7% +0.04 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 103.8 +0.03
19 2011 1468 97.1 +1.66 -2.13 0.683 42.9% — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.18 2008 1844 155.6 +2.09 +2.87 1.075 51.6% -8 -147 — 59.4% +0.56 10–9 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 108.8 -3.69
20 2012 1445 104.0 +1.53 -4.70 0.756 45.0% +44 — — 14.3% -2.14 — — — -0.46 2009 1735 137.2 +0.81 +1.93 1.075 51.5% -29 +84 -128 59.0% +0.64 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.6 +0.20
21 2013 1515 116.1 +2.68 -3.87 0.984 49.7% +34 -71 +36 45.0% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 -0.31 2010 1754 142.7 +0.27 +0.68 0.989 49.8% -26 +62 -79 54.4% +0.28 9–8 (53%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 +0.39
22 2014 1801 141.2 +4.39 -0.61 1.109 51.9% 0 -220 -224 60.9% +0.70 15–10 (60%) 10–7 (59%) 106.9 +0.20 2011 1894 146.9 +1.53 +4.23 1.113 52.5% -32 -107 -88 61.0% +0.76 15–7 (68%) 9–5 (64%) 108.0 -1.26
23 2015 1815 145.3 +4.92 -0.94 1.100 51.8% +19 -177 -128 60.8% +0.67 19–7 (73%) 13–11 (54%) 108.0 +2.74 2012 1791 146.5 +0.57 +4.09 1.101 52.3% -2 +69 -30 59.1% +0.78 6–11 (35%) 10–4 (71%) 97.7 +0.95
24 2016 1896 151.5 +6.52 +1.70 1.194 53.3% +6 -233 -105 61.9% +0.99 11–6 (65%) 9–14 (39%) 101.0 -0.57 2013 1735 139.1 +0.40 +2.51 1.022 50.5% +15 +39 +28 51.7% +0.30 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 98.9 +0.89
25 2017 1929 157.4 +7.32 +1.47 1.225 53.9% +22 -159 -42 68.6% +1.31 12–7 (63%) 8–11 (42%) 99.8 +1.32 2014 1719 152.6 +1.29 +4.23 1.109 52.3% +50 +17 +28 59.8% +0.75 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.4 -0.25
26 2018 1921 156.9 +4.54 +1.21 1.118 52.1% +3 +8 -35 62.5% +0.75 16–6 (73%) 12–8 (60%) 105.8 -0.73 2015 1757 143.5 -0.51 +1.77 0.989 49.9% +26 — -24 50.6% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–4 (60%) 105.0 -0.11
27 2019 1980 157.5 +7.44 +2.67 1.263 54.4% +1 -8 -3 68.7% +1.37 19–12 (61%) 8–8 (50%) 98.3 +1.00 2016 1952 148.1 +2.12 +4.65 1.136 52.9% -29 -154 -64 65.1% +0.91 19–10 (66%) 9–6 (60%) 108.8 -1.07
28 2020 1917 146.8 +3.25 +0.83 1.125 52.4% -13 +73 — 58.8% +0.96 5–2 (71%) 2–7 (22%) 97.0 -0.18 2017 1778 142.2 +1.03 +1.88 1.067 51.5% +59 -13 +40 55.3% +0.37 9–11 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 93.4 +2.63
29 2021 1970 149.6 +3.90 +0.30 1.047 51.1% -17 +46 +115 59.8% +0.56 13–4 (76%) 8–6 (57%) 104.7 +1.20 2018 1872 145.7 +1.54 +1.61 1.058 51.3% +3 -108 -24 58.3% +0.53 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 101.4 -0.82
30 2022 1836 136.2 +1.10 -0.03 0.992 50.1% +34 +46 +173 48.5% +0.10 12–5 (71%) 6–9 (40%) 97.8 +1.04 2019 1755 115.9 -0.72 -0.79 0.839 46.7% +34 -72 — 29.6% -1.19 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — -0.69
31 2023 1763 149.7 +2.46 +0.60 1.021 50.2% +68 +75 +144 48.1% +0.15 4–7 (36%) 1–8 (11%) 87.6 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1778 141.4 +1.97 -0.71 1.007 50.4% +61 -2 +155 56.2% +0.14 9–10 (47%) 9–5 (64%) 100.9 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 1728 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1856 135.9 +1.06 -1.25 0.979 49.3% -58 +30 +102 58.9% -0.01 8–3 (73%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2045 152.8 +4.37 +0.29 1.095 51.7% +14 -53 +11 59.3% +0.63 147–86 (63%) 96–100 (49%) 101.2 +0.73 — 1964 150.3 +0.95 +2.81 1.063 51.4% 0 -11 -38 57.0% +0.50 116–98 (54%) 83–60 (58%) 107.2 -0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.