H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 10:32 UTC
Karolina Pliskova vs Julia Goerges H2H: 2-0
Karolina Pliskova holds a 2–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karolina Pliskova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Pliskova won the 2016 Australian Open second round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Karolina Pliskova | 7-6 6-1 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2014* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Karolina Pliskova | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Pliskova | #64 | #1 | 6,940 | 2,041 | 421 | 241 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 17 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Karolina Pliskova | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #736 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #465 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #118 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #71 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #4 | 1,930 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,916 | 0 | 11 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2019 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #2 | 1,975 | 0 | 15 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #6 | 1,914 | 0 | 16 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2021 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #4 | 1,972 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,834 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #38 | 1,759 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #41 | 1,777 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #64 | 1,879 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |