H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Kateryna Baindl vs Isabella Shinikova H2H: 0-1
Isabella Shinikova holds a 1–0 lead over Kateryna Baindl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabella Shinikova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabella Shinikova won the 2016 Bucharest third round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 32
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 34
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2016* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Isabella Shinikova | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,730 | 75 | 107 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isabella Shinikova | #381 | #133 | 442 | 1,569 | 4 | 11 | 26.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kateryna Baindl | Isabella Shinikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |