H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Kateryna Baindl vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1

Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Kateryna Baindl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2015 Quebec City round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kateryna Baindl
Ukraine Age 32 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 6-1 6-1 Kateryna Baindl #213 Match data Sep 17, 2015* R32 Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kateryna Baindl #467 #62 922 1,726 75 106 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kateryna Baindl Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2013 1–2 33.3% #200 1,486 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2014 1–3 25.0% #140 1,477 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2015 5–10 33.3% #162 1,473 0 0 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2016 12–11 52.2% #102 1,608 0 0 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2017 7–12 36.8% #86 1,566 0 0 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2018 12–15 44.4% #98 1,526 0 0 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2019 13–16 44.8% #91 1,664 0 0 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2020 2–6 25.0% #106 1,623 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2021 9–11 45.0% #144 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2022 4–5 44.4% #99 1,679 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2023 9–13 40.9% #132 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2024 0–2 0.0% #445 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kateryna Baindl Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2013 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2014 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2015 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2018 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 67 112 40.2% 26 28 54 48.1% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 173/182 of Kateryna Baindl's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kateryna Baindl Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2013 3/3 0.7 3.0 71.3% 54.3% 42.0% 66.6% 57.1% 50.4% 44.5% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2014 4/4 0.8 3.5 66.7% 56.2% 45.3% 55.8% 63.1% 52.6% 41.7% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2015 9/15 1.4 1.4 66.8% 56.0% 50.4% 56.2% 48.2% 54.4% 35.0% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2016 23/24 1.4 2.3 69.0% 60.2% 46.4% 48.2% 50.7% 56.0% 46.4% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2017 19/19 2.1 1.8 68.8% 58.9% 46.1% 51.0% 50.3% 54.9% 45.8% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2018 26/27 2.5 2.5 65.3% 60.6% 42.7% 46.1% 48.3% 54.5% 42.1% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2019 28/29 1.8 3.1 64.8% 59.1% 43.5% 45.1% 53.4% 53.6% 46.1% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2020 8/8 2.6 2.3 68.5% 58.3% 42.0% 44.4% 56.6% 53.0% 43.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 20/20 1.1 5.1 68.9% 60.3% 41.4% 45.1% 47.8% 54.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 9/9 1.4 3.3 75.7% 59.2% 38.1% 57.8% 50.5% 54.1% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 22/22 0.8 2.4 73.0% 58.4% 42.7% 48.8% 49.1% 53.8% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 2/2 0.0 2.5 68.6% 51.7% 14.8% 26.8% 25.0% 40.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 173/182 1.6 2.8 68.4% 59.1% 43.4% 48.4% 50.4% 54.1% 43.9% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kateryna Baindl Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2013 1487 98.2 -2.57 -1.35 0.897 47.5% +20 — — 37.5% -1.13 1–1 — — +0.31 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2014 1477 103.7 -1.18 -0.33 0.880 48.0% +14 — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.24 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2015 1473 103.5 -1.86 -3.84 0.768 45.2% +3 — — 32.3% -1.39 1–0 1–1 — +0.37 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2016 1609 123.4 +0.05 +1.48 1.055 51.1% -22 -19 +18 52.9% +0.22 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.71 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2017 1566 112.7 -0.46 +1.02 1.017 50.1% -42 +43 — 40.5% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 2–6 (25%) 92.9 +0.43 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2018 1527 113.1 -1.72 -1.69 0.925 48.4% -7 +57 — 50.0% -0.26 1–7 (13%) 5–2 (71%) 95.3 +1.44 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2019 1664 128.4 -2.21 +1.99 0.993 49.8% -64 +78 — 48.4% -0.10 4–6 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +0.33 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2020 1624 122.7 -1.33 -0.67 0.920 48.5% -26 — — 36.8% -0.68 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 1691 123.1 -0.60 -0.16 0.955 48.9% -72 +77 -49 45.1% -0.29 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 1679 115.5 -0.68 +1.66 1.024 50.5% — +142 — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 1618 113.8 -2.11 -0.60 0.924 48.4% -12 +99 — 42.0% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 1551 97.6 -1.46 -2.17 0.652 39.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 122.5 -1.28 +0.08 0.957 49.1% -25 +70 -16 44.1% -0.46 20–38 (34%) 20–21 (49%) 91.7 +1.63 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.