H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kateryna Volodko vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 1-3

Maria Kirilenko holds a 3–1 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2010 Moscow round of 16 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Kirilenko #24 6-0 6-0 Kateryna Volodko #126 Match data Oct 22, 2010* R16 Moscow Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Maria Kirilenko #28 6-1 6-3 Kateryna Volodko #43 Match data Aug 11, 2010* R64 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kateryna Volodko #32 6-2 2-6 7-6(2) Maria Kirilenko #58 Match data Oct 5, 2009 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Maria Kirilenko #39 6-4 0-6 6-4 Kateryna Volodko #59 Match data Mar 27, 2009* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,802 138 190 42.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,918 286 230 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kateryna Volodko Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,535 0 0 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1
19 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1
20 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,622 0 0 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #62 1,640 0 1 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5
22 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,770 0 1 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,720 0 5
23 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,666 0 1 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,829 0 5
24 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,720 0 1 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5
25 2012 7–12 36.8% #136 1,656 0 1 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6
27 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,616 0 1 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6
28 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,605 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,652 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2018 4–12 25.0% #132 1,587 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,554 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,519 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,534 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,553 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,543 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kateryna Volodko Maria Kirilenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
18 2005 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 24 17 41 58.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2008 4 12 16 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2009 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2010 7 12 19 36.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2015 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 8 11 19 42.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 117 201 41.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 17 19 36 47.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — 203 151 354 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 282/323 of Kateryna Volodko's and 385/513 of Maria Kirilenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kateryna Volodko Maria Kirilenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/10 0.7 4.7 67.0% 62.0% 54.6% 48.5% 58.2% 59.5% 41.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/17 1.7 6.7 58.3% 62.1% 49.2% 53.1% 46.4% 56.7% 42.0%
18 2005 4/14 4.3 4.8 51.4% 66.4% 43.7% 52.6% 32.1% 55.4% 39.6% 2005 9/50 1.6 2.7 59.7% 57.9% 43.6% 52.4% 52.3% 52.4% 35.9%
19 2006 8/15 3.0 6.1 54.5% 61.2% 47.5% 44.5% 48.0% 54.8% 42.2% 2006 34/48 2.3 4.6 60.9% 63.7% 45.3% 51.9% 41.2% 56.5% 44.6%
20 2007 27/32 2.7 4.6 57.4% 63.9% 44.4% 57.8% 50.6% 55.6% 43.3% 2007 47/54 2.5 3.5 65.8% 64.6% 48.1% 52.4% 46.7% 58.8% 45.3%
21 2008 33/34 2.4 3.7 57.4% 64.2% 46.1% 49.9% 47.7% 56.6% 40.0% 2008 45/56 1.8 3.0 67.5% 61.8% 47.0% 51.0% 49.8% 57.0% 46.5%
22 2009 41/43 2.0 3.5 63.5% 62.3% 44.6% 49.5% 49.1% 55.7% 43.8% 2009 42/45 1.8 3.2 63.3% 61.6% 45.0% 49.9% 46.5% 55.6% 43.5%
23 2010 21/23 2.7 4.4 60.6% 59.9% 41.6% 45.5% 43.5% 52.7% 43.1% 2010 56/60 1.6 2.7 65.1% 64.4% 48.9% 51.5% 46.6% 59.0% 46.4%
24 2011 23/24 1.5 3.8 64.8% 62.4% 43.3% 53.4% 60.9% 56.0% 46.7% 2011 47/52 1.7 3.0 69.1% 62.7% 49.8% 48.9% 51.8% 58.6% 47.3%
25 2012 17/19 1.7 6.8 64.1% 61.2% 35.3% 50.6% 44.1% 51.9% 42.7% 2012 41/55 2.6 3.2 65.0% 65.3% 44.9% 52.7% 49.7% 58.2% 44.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 46/52 3.3 3.7 59.5% 64.8% 49.8% 56.9% 44.3% 58.9% 43.5%
27 2014 2/2 0.5 6.0 63.1% 68.8% 28.9% 54.5% 49.2% 53.9% 42.4% 2014 12/14 2.2 3.6 64.6% 59.2% 36.4% 48.8% 39.3% 50.9% 41.6%
28 2015 14/22 1.5 5.3 69.1% 62.2% 47.4% 59.2% 56.9% 57.6% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 31/31 2.5 4.5 64.8% 62.1% 43.6% 51.6% 52.0% 55.3% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 26/27 2.5 5.1 62.8% 62.7% 43.7% 47.0% 57.8% 55.6% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 14/16 2.1 5.7 60.0% 60.4% 41.8% 50.4% 40.5% 53.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 2/2 2.5 7.5 48.6% 58.1% 32.0% 37.5% 34.1% 44.6% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 13/13 2.1 6.0 59.6% 64.5% 40.3% 55.8% 53.2% 54.5% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 3/3 2.0 3.3 58.4% 51.7% 41.3% 47.5% 33.2% 47.4% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 61.7% 54.7% 35.4% 54.2% 69.0% 47.4% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.3% 70.5% 65.5% 60.0% 25.0% 68.5% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 282/328 2.2 4.6 61.5% 62.4% 43.3% 51.1% 50.1% 55.0% 42.8% — 385/516 2.2 3.4 64.5% 63.3% 47.2% 51.8% 47.2% 57.6% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kateryna Volodko Maria Kirilenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52
16 2003 1493 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.13 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35
17 2004 1470 92.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0–1 — -0.06 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -41 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38
18 2005 1535 114.5 -0.65 -1.39 0.888 47.3% +53 -74 — 48.4% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 +0.22 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06
19 2006 1530 109.9 -0.47 -1.41 0.933 48.7% +34 -81 — 39.4% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.19 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13
20 2007 1623 134.3 -0.20 +0.29 0.974 49.7% -9 -92 — 40.5% -0.53 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.9 -1.23 2007 1740 140.8 +3.14 +1.31 1.100 52.1% +5 -194 -199 54.4% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.64
21 2008 1641 129.4 +1.11 -2.53 0.922 48.7% -55 -111 +64 44.9% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.4 -0.94 2008 1725 136.8 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +93 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.04
22 2009 1771 139.2 +0.57 +0.61 0.989 49.9% -80 -106 -46 53.5% +0.09 8–7 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -0.90 2009 1720 129.5 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -218 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.07
23 2010 1667 123.1 -2.00 -0.23 0.911 47.7% -7 -36 — 37.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.17 2010 1830 151.8 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -271 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69
24 2011 1721 131.2 +0.20 +2.11 1.061 51.5% -32 -47 -19 62.0% +0.92 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -1.37 2011 1848 143.7 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% 0 -89 -260 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59
25 2012 1656 118.5 -1.96 -0.33 0.888 47.3% +28 -33 +55 36.4% -0.91 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -1.12 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +18 -110 -42 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1791 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +16 +6 -68 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73
27 2014 1617 101.3 -2.50 -3.04 0.919 47.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.07 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +12 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37
28 2015 1605 129.5 -0.14 -0.79 0.935 49.1% +30 -35 — 40.8% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.1 -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1673 127.0 -0.24 +0.59 0.993 49.8% +20 -110 +22 44.9% -0.05 9–7 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 98.5 -1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1653 121.1 -0.88 +1.50 1.012 50.3% +65 -155 — 48.3% -0.15 3–7 (30%) 2–4 (33%) 95.5 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1587 117.1 -1.92 -1.90 0.835 46.5% +93 -154 +97 34.2% -0.89 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 100.9 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1555 96.1 -2.89 -0.91 0.739 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1520 114.3 -2.12 -1.71 0.910 48.5% +80 — — 38.7% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1535 102.9 -0.85 -0.91 0.710 42.6% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1550 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1553 107.2 -1.05 +0.97 0.736 44.2% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1543 102.6 -0.34 -0.32 1.010 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1802 130.3 -0.44 -0.15 0.950 49.0% +5 -92 +35 44.0% -0.33 52–60 (46%) 33–52 (39%) 94.5 -1.88 — 1919 145.3 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.