H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Elise Burgin H2H: 4-0
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 4–0 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1986 Roland Garros second round 7-6(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1983* | Tampa | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-2 6-3 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1982* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-1 6-4 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1981* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-2 6-2 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |