H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kiki Bertens vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 2-3

Alizé Cornet holds a 3–2 lead over Kiki Bertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alizé Cornet leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2018 Charleston Open quarterfinal 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Alizé Cornet
France Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kiki Bertens #27 6-2 7-5 Alizé Cornet #37 Match data Apr 7, 2018* QF Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Alizé Cornet #58 7-6(1) 6-3 Kiki Bertens #22 Match data Aug 17, 2016* R64 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alizé Cornet #24 6-1 6-3 Kiki Bertens #86 Match data Apr 9, 2015* R32 Katowice International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Kiki Bertens #73 6-2 6-3 Alizé Cornet #21 Match data Oct 17, 2014* R16 Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Alizé Cornet #32 7-5 7-6(8) Kiki Bertens #58 Match data May 8, 2013* R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,004 216 172 55.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 379 361 51.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kiki Bertens Alizé Cornet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 36–22 62.1% #16 1,781 0 1
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,662 0 1
20 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,580 0 1 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1
21 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,551 0 1 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,561 0 1
22 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,579 0 1 2012 22–20 52.4% #44 1,640 0 2
23 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3
24 2016 26–20 56.5% #22 1,689 0 2 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,791 0 4
25 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,696 0 5 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,631 0 4
26 2018 46–23 66.7% #9 1,911 0 8 2016 22–21 51.2% #41 1,704 0 5
27 2019 57–26 68.7% #9 1,897 0 10 2017 24–22 52.2% #38 1,754 0 5
28 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,882 0 11 2018 23–24 48.9% #45 1,689 0 6
29 2021 1–8 11.1% #25 1,733 0 11 2019 24–20 54.5% #59 1,698 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,771 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2021 24–24 50.0% #61 1,744 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,752 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2023 12–18 40.0% #117 1,671 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,607 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,554 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kiki Bertens Alizé Cornet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 12 13 25 48.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2011 7 8 15 46.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 17 15 32 53.1% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2016 7 14 21 33.3% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 28 16 44 63.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 2017 7 16 23 30.4% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 16 18 34 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2018 26 15 41 63.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2019 30 18 48 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2020 10 3 13 76.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 13 11 24 54.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 16 15 31 51.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 16 16 32 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 98 107 205 47.8% 95 45 140 67.9% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — 217 208 425 51.1% 122 107 229 53.3% 33 38 71 46.5% 7 8 15 46.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's and 665/741 of Alizé Cornet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kiki Bertens Alizé Cornet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/2 1.5 1.5 58.6% 56.3% 41.2% 45.0% 34.8% 49.8% 41.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 1.3 6.7 58.0% 57.6% 45.5% 62.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 8/17 1.4 4.8 57.0% 61.7% 36.5% 46.8% 39.4% 50.8% 47.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 48/58 2.4 3.1 59.4% 64.4% 43.4% 55.4% 56.2% 55.9% 47.1%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.7% 61.1% 32.3% 50.0% 42.9% 47.8% 40.9% 2009 43/44 1.9 4.9 55.0% 59.8% 44.5% 47.9% 44.7% 52.9% 45.0%
20 2012 23/23 2.9 4.1 60.5% 65.3% 41.1% 49.3% 48.2% 55.7% 42.3% 2010 32/37 2.3 3.6 60.6% 63.2% 40.3% 52.0% 47.3% 54.3% 45.9%
21 2013 30/33 2.2 5.5 57.6% 61.8% 42.9% 51.9% 45.5% 54.1% 43.7% 2011 26/27 2.2 5.1 59.0% 59.3% 40.6% 51.5% 55.2% 51.6% 45.2%
22 2014 22/25 2.7 4.0 58.1% 60.8% 44.5% 49.6% 41.8% 53.8% 45.8% 2012 36/42 1.2 4.7 61.0% 60.7% 40.8% 49.1% 53.9% 52.8% 48.2%
23 2015 19/24 1.9 5.1 63.9% 59.1% 51.6% 53.8% 57.3% 56.1% 36.8% 2013 51/62 2.1 4.7 60.5% 61.5% 44.5% 54.0% 52.2% 54.8% 47.0%
24 2016 45/46 3.8 3.4 60.1% 67.4% 47.6% 55.6% 44.9% 59.0% 46.0% 2014 52/61 1.5 5.0 62.9% 63.4% 45.2% 49.6% 51.5% 56.5% 47.0%
25 2017 54/56 4.5 4.4 55.5% 71.4% 43.7% 54.1% 50.0% 59.1% 45.9% 2015 42/49 1.8 5.9 65.7% 62.3% 48.9% 48.9% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1%
26 2018 64/69 4.8 4.0 58.0% 69.1% 47.9% 51.8% 51.7% 60.0% 46.8% 2016 35/43 1.5 5.5 63.1% 62.7% 41.0% 58.8% 51.0% 54.5% 44.7%
27 2019 76/83 5.6 4.4 57.1% 72.6% 47.2% 58.5% 48.8% 61.8% 43.6% 2017 41/46 1.0 4.3 64.3% 59.3% 41.1% 52.6% 51.7% 52.9% 47.4%
28 2020 19/19 4.2 3.8 63.7% 68.3% 43.5% 59.6% 57.0% 59.1% 47.0% 2018 45/47 1.2 3.6 65.2% 60.9% 45.3% 52.0% 50.6% 55.5% 44.7%
29 2021 8/9 1.5 4.8 64.5% 58.8% 40.4% 44.2% 43.1% 51.9% 37.9% 2019 44/44 1.5 3.2 63.1% 63.5% 46.3% 51.5% 50.0% 57.1% 47.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 22/22 2.2 4.7 62.6% 66.3% 42.6% 56.0% 51.4% 57.5% 44.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 47/49 1.6 4.5 63.0% 62.7% 42.0% 52.0% 51.8% 54.8% 45.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 49/49 2.2 4.6 58.7% 65.5% 45.2% 51.7% 48.8% 57.2% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 30/30 1.5 5.3 63.6% 61.9% 42.7% 52.0% 54.8% 54.8% 43.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 8/8 1.4 5.6 58.6% 57.6% 36.6% 52.0% 36.2% 48.6% 39.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 1/1 0.0 5.0 50.9% 51.9% 23.1% 0.0% 16.7% 37.7% 38.3%
Career — 361/388 4.0 4.3 58.6% 67.8% 45.8% 54.1% 49.0% 58.5% 44.6% — 665/741 1.7 4.5 61.6% 62.2% 43.5% 51.9% 50.9% 55.0% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kiki Bertens Alizé Cornet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1516 106.6 -1.79 +1.78 0.836 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 1–0 — -0.03
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1510 102.3 -1.61 -2.20 0.893 47.7% — — — 37.5% -0.87 1–1 — — +0.29
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1570 120.8 -1.99 +1.24 0.957 48.9% -48 +43 — 48.7% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1782 146.7 +0.62 +3.01 1.067 51.6% -112 +74 — 59.5% +0.78 11–8 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.5 -0.33
19 2011 1494 97.6 +1.77 -1.03 0.783 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.13 2009 1663 128.7 -2.23 +1.23 0.955 49.3% +16 +59 — 45.1% -0.31 8–6 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.18
20 2012 1580 118.0 +0.05 -1.16 0.955 49.1% -24 +11 +4 47.1% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.6 -0.87 2010 1611 121.0 -1.21 +1.16 1.003 50.1% +7 +76 — 48.8% +0.02 4–8 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.69
21 2013 1551 121.8 -1.34 -0.74 0.952 48.8% +33 +22 — 44.6% -0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.04 2011 1562 123.0 -3.16 +0.65 0.933 48.4% +57 +60 — 39.3% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 -1.01
22 2014 1580 124.4 -1.78 +0.96 0.993 49.7% -23 +77 — 47.2% -0.02 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.24 2012 1640 126.5 -2.48 +2.74 1.023 50.5% -34 +105 -109 50.0% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 108.0 +0.06
23 2015 1520 114.8 -1.77 -2.92 0.837 46.5% -52 +93 +82 34.5% -1.07 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 95.7 -1.23 2013 1731 137.4 -0.53 +2.45 1.040 51.0% -10 +13 -220 54.9% +0.32 12–10 (55%) 10–5 (67%) 106.1 +0.65
24 2016 1689 132.6 +2.91 +1.95 1.122 52.4% -129 +137 -72 54.6% +0.61 6–5 (55%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.68 2014 1792 145.4 +0.93 +3.61 1.080 51.7% +29 -135 -154 54.2% +0.46 17–9 (65%) 8–12 (40%) 104.0 -0.76
25 2017 1696 135.9 +2.41 +1.24 1.122 52.6% -173 +308 -130 54.9% +0.68 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +1.57 2015 1631 126.7 -0.36 +1.69 1.041 50.7% +22 +52 -29 47.9% -0.03 10–11 (48%) 1–7 (13%) 91.6 +1.81
26 2018 1911 154.4 +3.14 +4.20 1.171 53.3% -97 +80 -217 63.3% +1.14 14–12 (54%) 10–15 (40%) 100.3 -1.83 2016 1704 131.6 -0.75 +1.42 0.982 49.8% +19 -93 -99 48.9% +0.14 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.07
27 2019 1897 153.7 +4.80 +1.58 1.142 52.4% -14 +155 -90 65.1% +0.95 18–13 (58%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 +0.54 2017 1755 137.4 -2.79 +3.62 1.006 50.0% +35 -111 -216 51.0% +0.11 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.01
28 2020 1883 144.7 +1.90 +2.64 1.150 53.1% +54 +91 — 65.1% +1.09 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +1.01 2018 1689 134.8 -1.25 +1.50 1.004 50.1% -15 +85 -137 48.1% -0.04 6–8 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.03
29 2021 1733 102.2 -2.11 -1.63 0.787 44.9% +114 +208 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.66 2019 1699 130.0 +0.27 +3.19 1.115 52.5% -21 +47 -95 56.7% +0.59 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +1.36
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1771 138.5 +0.58 +1.50 1.044 51.5% +8 -35 — 55.3% +0.64 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 103.6 +0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1744 132.4 -0.78 +2.82 1.016 50.4% +5 -128 -57 48.1% +0.06 10–4 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 106.9 -1.70
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1753 141.3 +0.38 +1.27 1.028 50.7% -22 -126 +32 55.3% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 +0.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1671 113.6 -1.47 -0.64 0.957 49.0% -36 -30 +86 39.4% -0.37 7–4 (64%) 2–7 (22%) 98.9 +0.47
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1607 107.6 -3.28 -1.77 0.763 44.3% -37 +7 — 16.7% -2.50 1–1 — — -0.48
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1554 97.7 +1.43 +0.15 0.615 38.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01
Career — 2004 143.8 +2.04 +1.38 1.074 51.4% -53 +144 -88 55.1% +0.46 62–63 (50%) 46–50 (48%) 100.2 -0.84 — 1884 138.4 -0.83 +2.02 1.016 50.4% -1 +21 -65 50.3% +0.12 127–114 (53%) 74–76 (49%) 101.7 0.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.