H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Kiki Bertens vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 2-3

Alizé Cornet holds a 3–2 lead over Kiki Bertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alizé Cornet leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2018 Charleston quarterfinal 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Alizé Cornet
FRA Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 7, 2018* Charleston WTA 500 QF Clay Kiki Bertens #27 6-2 7-5 Alizé Cornet #37 Match data
Aug 17, 2016* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Alizé Cornet #58 7-6(1) 6-3 Kiki Bertens #22 Match data
Apr 9, 2015* Katowice WTA 250 R32 Hard Alizé Cornet #24 6-1 6-3 Kiki Bertens #86 Match data
Oct 17, 2014* Luxembourg WTA 250 R16 Hard Kiki Bertens #73 6-2 6-3 Alizé Cornet #21 Match data
May 8, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Alizé Cornet #32 7-5 7-6(8) Kiki Bertens #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,015 214 168 56.0% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 376 358 51.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kiki Bertens Alizé Cornet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,510 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 34–21 61.8% #16 1,775 0 1
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,660 0 1
20 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,581 0 1 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1
21 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,552 0 1 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,560 0 1
22 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,580 0 1 2012 21–19 52.5% #44 1,637 0 2
23 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3
24 2016 27–19 58.7% #22 1,723 0 2 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,789 0 4
25 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,684 0 5 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,632 0 4
26 2018 46–22 67.6% #9 1,912 0 8 2016 20–19 51.3% #41 1,702 0 5
27 2019 54–25 68.4% #9 1,897 0 10 2017 23–22 51.1% #38 1,750 0 5
28 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,883 0 11 2018 22–23 48.9% #45 1,693 0 6
29 2021 1–7 12.5% #25 1,749 0 11 2019 25–22 53.2% #59 1,683 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,763 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2021 24–23 51.1% #61 1,744 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,755 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2023 15–19 44.1% #117 1,684 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,613 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,558 0 6