H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 0-1
Angelique Kerber holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Clijsters in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angelique Kerber leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2012 Wimbledon fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Angelique Kerber | 6-1 6-1 | Kim Clijsters | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Angelique Kerber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |