H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 2-0
Kim Clijsters holds a 2–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2005 Luxembourg final 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2005* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 6-4 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2005* | Stanford | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-4 6-0 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kim Clijsters | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |