H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 3-0
Kim Clijsters holds a 3–0 lead over Caroline Wozniacki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2012 Australian Open quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-3 7-6(4) | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2010* | WTA Championships | WTA Finals | F | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 7-5 6-3 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |