H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 2-0
Kim Clijsters holds a 2–0 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2006 Australian Open third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-1 6-2 | Roberta Vinci | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Kim Clijsters | 6-3 6-4 | Roberta Vinci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Roberta Vinci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |