H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Serena Williams H2H: 2-7

Serena Williams holds a 7–2 lead over Kim Clijsters in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 7–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2009 US Open semifinal 6-4 7-5.

BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 7
9 main draw meetings
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 12, 2009* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Kim Clijsters #5 6-4 7-5 Serena Williams #2 Match data
Mar 24, 2003* Miami WTA 1000 SF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-2 Kim Clijsters #3 Match data
Jan 26, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Serena Williams #1 4-6 6-3 7-5 Kim Clijsters #4 Match data
Nov 14, 2002* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals F Hard Kim Clijsters #4 7-5 6-3 Serena Williams #1 Match data
Sep 22, 2002* Tokyo WTA 500 F Hard Serena Williams #1 2-6 6-3 6-3 Kim Clijsters #8 Match data
Mar 25, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Serena Williams #7 6-0 6-2 Kim Clijsters #16 Match data
Mar 14, 2001* Indian Wells WTA 1000 F Hard Serena Williams #10 4-6 6-4 6-2 Kim Clijsters #19 Match data
Mar 14, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Serena Williams #4 6-4 6-4 Kim Clijsters #33 Match data
Sep 5, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Serena Williams #6 4-6 6-2 7-5 Kim Clijsters #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 23 71