H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Tatiana Golovin H2H: 2-0

Kim Clijsters holds a 2–0 lead over Tatiana Golovin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2007 Antwerp semifinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Tatiana Golovin
FRA Age 38 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Clijsters #4 6-4 6-3 Tatiana Golovin #20 Match data Feb 17, 2007* SF Antwerp Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Kim Clijsters #1 4-6 7-6(4) 7-5 Tatiana Golovin #24 Match data Feb 17, 2006* R16 Antwerp Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,299 466 128 78.5% 4 7 3 18 9 41
Tatiana Golovin #1,128 #12 1,882 2,014 131 80 62.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Tatiana Golovin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2003 1–4 20.0% #358 1,479 0 0
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 2004 27–15 64.3% #27 1,748 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,913 0 3 2005 33–22 60.0% #24 1,770 0 0
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,036 0 6 2006 25–18 58.1% #22 1,831 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,146 0 10 2007 43–17 71.7% #13 1,982 0 2
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,261 0 19 2008 2–4 33.3% #254 1,892 0 2
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,246 0 21 — — — — — — —
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,234 1 30 — — — — — — —
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,165 1 33 — — — — — — —
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,128 1 34 — — — — — — —
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,140 2 35 — — — — — — —
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,189 3 40 — — — — — — —
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,054 4 41 — — — — — — —
29 2012 20–7 74.1% #20 2,022 4 41 — — — — — — —
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,956 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,908 4 41 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Clijsters Tatiana Golovin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1999 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2004 15 9 24 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
17 2000 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2005 21 15 36 58.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
18 2001 32 12 44 72.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 0 4 100.0% 2006 21 14 35 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 2002 37 11 48 77.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 32 14 46 69.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2003 57 7 64 89.1% 15 2 17 88.2% 9 1 10 90.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2004 13 3 16 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 50 5 55 90.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 24 8 32 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 32 4 36 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 16 4 20 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 322 80 402 80.1% 59 23 82 72.0% 54 17 71 76.1% 31 8 39 79.5% — 92 57 149 61.7% 15 12 27 55.6% 13 6 19 68.4% 11 5 16 68.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 201/388 of Kim Clijsters's and 107/211 of Tatiana Golovin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kim Clijsters Tatiana Golovin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/5 1.0 7.0 50.0% 59.3% 37.0% 0.0% 100.0% 48.1% 33.3%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 9/42 2.1 5.2 58.4% 61.7% 40.6% 52.1% 46.7% 53.0% 47.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 12/55 1.8 5.5 59.2% 67.2% 44.5% 52.8% 49.5% 57.8% 48.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 28/43 2.6 2.8 66.1% 63.3% 47.6% 56.4% 51.0% 57.8% 45.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 52/60 3.1 3.0 63.8% 66.7% 48.4% 62.0% 47.7% 60.1% 47.8%
20 2003 20/98 2.1 2.5 66.4% 70.7% 49.9% 61.6% 57.5% 64.3% 52.7% 2008 5/6 2.4 3.4 64.9% 62.8% 43.6% 44.6% 41.4% 56.4% 45.4%
21 2004 7/22 1.0 4.7 61.9% 68.5% 52.6% 58.8% 62.8% 62.3% 53.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 21/75 2.8 4.3 62.2% 71.7% 47.9% 48.4% 54.4% 62.6% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 32/53 2.0 3.3 64.2% 67.8% 47.9% 60.1% 49.3% 60.7% 49.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 13/18 1.8 4.6 60.4% 68.1% 53.6% 46.8% 48.2% 62.7% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 16/16 2.8 4.1 63.0% 69.2% 54.9% 62.5% 54.3% 63.7% 48.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 42/46 2.9 4.5 62.0% 69.3% 51.6% 61.4% 53.0% 62.6% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 27/28 2.0 5.0 64.0% 67.6% 46.2% 56.0% 52.0% 60.1% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 18/27 2.5 3.4 66.3% 71.8% 49.0% 57.8% 43.7% 64.1% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 3/3 5.3 6.7 66.9% 62.7% 44.2% 61.9% 30.0% 56.2% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 2/2 2.0 9.0 63.1% 58.9% 37.9% 49.2% 41.7% 51.0% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201/594 2.4 4.1 63.5% 69.1% 49.7% 57.7% 51.7% 62.1% 49.7% — 107/211 2.7 3.5 63.4% 65.2% 46.8% 57.3% 48.8% 58.3% 47.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Clijsters Tatiana Golovin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1480 104.4 -1.25 -1.00 0.643 41.4% +46 — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.07
16 1999 1725 145.5 — — — — -30 -155 -56 67.3% +1.53 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.43 2004 1749 139.2 -0.81 +2.08 1.016 50.5% -50 -271 +70 58.1% +0.63 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.07
17 2000 1913 156.2 — — — — +15 -370 -218 60.2% +0.62 11–8 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -1.40 2005 1770 139.7 +1.57 +1.88 1.144 53.0% -21 -181 +35 60.2% +0.68 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.5 -0.53
18 2001 2036 161.2 — — — — +15 -316 -171 69.3% +1.43 15–7 (68%) 7–2 (78%) 111.5 -0.33 2006 1831 151.9 +1.85 +1.96 1.079 51.7% +15 — — 59.4% +0.92 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 98.9 +0.88
19 2002 2146 168.0 — — — — +28 -315 -318 69.1% +1.50 12–9 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -1.80 2007 1983 161.9 +4.08 +4.22 1.198 53.9% -19 -194 — 70.6% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 6–1 (86%) 106.1 -0.34
20 2003 2262 176.5 +7.01 +7.29 1.478 58.4% +19 -206 -246 83.9% +2.65 12–7 (63%) 5–1 (83%) 104.0 -2.52 2008 1893 111.5 +0.56 +1.03 1.040 50.9% -2 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.16
21 2004 2247 155.4 +3.47 +3.81 1.426 57.9% +5 — — 90.2% +2.95 2–1 (67%) 4–0 (100%) 102.2 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 2235 173.2 +5.59 +5.46 1.367 56.6% +51 -182 -131 85.4% +2.89 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.3 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 2166 165.9 +5.11 +5.07 1.249 54.5% +47 -71 -23 75.2% +1.82 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -2.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 2128 161.0 +4.97 +3.93 1.322 55.5% +66 — — 70.7% +1.95 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 2141 159.8 +6.04 +5.04 1.334 55.9% +56 — — 73.7% +1.87 4–2 (67%) 0–1 — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 2190 168.6 +6.21 +7.25 1.348 56.4% +54 — -96 76.2% +2.15 11–4 (73%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 -2.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 2055 151.4 +3.98 +4.33 1.252 54.8% +97 — — 72.9% +1.73 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 101.4 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 2023 145.0 +6.00 +3.05 1.314 55.0% +75 — +54 73.6% +1.85 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1865 95.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1956 116.1 +0.27 +0.94 0.751 45.5% +63 — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1908 106.1 +0.32 -1.68 0.864 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2299 172.4 +5.39 +5.26 1.313 55.7% +36 -226 -114 74.6% +1.92 99–56 (64%) 55–34 (62%) 106.7 -2.42 — 2014 151.5 +2.59 +2.99 1.129 52.7% -15 -202 +58 61.1% +0.89 32–37 (46%) 23–23 (50%) 98.8 -0.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.