H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Elise Burgin H2H: 1-1

Kim Jones and Elise Burgin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on carpet, while Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1985 Dallas round of 32 5-7 7-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Jones
USA Age 68
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 5-7 7-6 7-6 Elise Burgin Match data Mar 14, 1985* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Elise Burgin 4-6 6-2 6-1 Kim Jones Match data Aug 17, 1982* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Elise Burgin #768 #27 20 1,845 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Elise Burgin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0
20 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,584 0 0
21 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,743 0 0
22 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,422 0 0 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,715 0 0
23 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,458 0 0 1985 29–23 55.8% #52 1,772 0 0
24 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,775 0 1
25 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,757 0 1 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1
26 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1
27 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,724 0 1 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1
28 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1
29 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Jones Elise Burgin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% — 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Elise Burgin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1476 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1509 111.3 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — -0.26
20 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 1982 1584 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.34
21 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 1983 1743 128.0 — — — — +6 — -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 — -0.95
22 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +36 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50 1984 1716 125.3 — — — — -22 — -103 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.38
23 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.50 1985 1773 137.6 — — — — -63 -51 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.48
24 1982 1484 103.7 — — — — -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59 1986 1776 142.7 — — — — -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.16
25 1983 1758 131.9 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43 1987 1703 130.2 — — — — -19 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.73
26 1984 1667 132.6 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22 1988 1629 115.8 — — — — +13 — +21 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.25
27 1985 1725 135.5 — — — — -10 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52 1989 1701 132.4 — — — — -21 +34 -81 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.05
28 1986 1677 104.5 — — — — -12 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.70 1990 1569 112.5 — — — — -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68
29 1987 1629 103.9 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.24 1991 1528 99.7 — — — — -19 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1524 109.4 — — — — 0 +174 — 37.5% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1496 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.02
Career — 1801 126.3 — — — — -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88 — 1846 134.3 — — — — -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -3.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.