H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Elise Burgin H2H: 0-1

Elise Burgin holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1984 Wimbledon round of 128 7-6 3-6 6-2.

USA Age 69
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 64 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elise Burgin #45 7-6 3-6 6-2 Kim Sands Match data Jun 27, 1984* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands 1,713 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elise Burgin #768 #27 20 1,845 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Elise Burgin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1980 0–2 0.0% 1,475 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 1981 2–3 40.0% 1,509 0 0
20 1982 7–10 41.2% 1,584 0 0
21 1978 4–4 50.0% 1,512 0 0 1983 13–9 59.1% 1,743 0 0
22 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,715 0 0
23 1980 11–22 33.3% 1,583 0 0 1985 29–23 55.8% #52 1,772 0 0
24 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,560 0 0 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,775 0 1
25 1982 3–16 15.8% 1,502 0 0 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1
26 1983 12–13 48.0% 1,622 0 0 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1
27 1984 10–23 30.3% 1,557 0 0 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1
28 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,545 0 0 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1
29 1986 1–10 9.1% 1,479 0 0 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1
30 1987 0–3 0.0% 1,455 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1
31 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Sands Elise Burgin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1980 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
26 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1993 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 18 35 53 34.0% 9 30 39 23.1% 12 24 36 33.3% 14 33 47 29.8% 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Elise Burgin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1980 1476 93.9 0.0% -3.00 +0.20
19 1976 1489 94.4 0.0% -5.50 -0.17 1981 1509 111.3 +69 45.5% -0.64 0–1 -0.26
20 1982 1584 111.4 +15 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.34
21 1978 1512 108.5 +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 +1.67 1983 1743 128.0 +6 -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 -0.95
22 1979 1490 96.5 20.0% -1.60 0–1 +0.15 1984 1716 125.3 -22 -103 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.38
23 1980 1583 118.8 +6 -110 -44 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.85 1985 1773 137.6 -63 -51 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.48
24 1981 1560 111.4 -8 -100 +50 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 +0.95 1986 1776 142.7 -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.16
25 1982 1503 104.0 +5 -143 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.85 1987 1703 130.2 -19 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.73
26 1983 1623 121.1 -14 -159 -27 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.37 1988 1629 115.8 +13 +21 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.25
27 1984 1557 125.8 +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.83 1989 1701 132.4 -21 +34 -81 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.05
28 1985 1546 109.7 +25 -108 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.26 1990 1569 112.5 -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68
29 1986 1480 109.1 +10 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.18 1991 1528 99.7 -19 0.0% -2.50 +0.25
30 1987 1456 103.5 14.3% -2.28 0–1 -0.17 1992 1524 109.4 0 +174 37.5% -1.50 0–2 +0.25
31 1993 1496 97.6 20.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.02
Career 1714 119.0 +12 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.4 +0.40 1846 134.3 -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -3.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.