H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kirsten Flipkens vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 0-2
Jelena Jankovic holds a 2–0 lead over Kirsten Flipkens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2009 Australian Open second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-4 7-5 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-2 6-3 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kirsten Flipkens | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |