H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kirsten Flipkens vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 3-1
Kirsten Flipkens holds a 3–1 lead over Kiki Bertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kirsten Flipkens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2018 Beijing third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2018 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Kiki Bertens | 6-1 6-1 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2018* | S-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Kirsten Flipkens | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-1 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| May 26, 2018* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Kirsten Flipkens | 5-7 6-3 7-6(3) | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2013 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Kirsten Flipkens | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kirsten Flipkens | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |