H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Kirsten Flipkens vs Mona Barthel H2H: 3-1
Kirsten Flipkens holds a 3–1 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kirsten Flipkens leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kirsten Flipkens won the 2014 Paris third round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2014* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Kirsten Flipkens | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| May 8, 2013* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Kirsten Flipkens | 6-4 6-1 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2013* | Hobart | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-4 6-4 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2012* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Kirsten Flipkens | 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | Mona Barthel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kirsten Flipkens | Mona Barthel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |