H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kirsten Flipkens vs Monica Niculescu H2H: 4-3

Kirsten Flipkens holds a 4–3 lead over Monica Niculescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Kirsten Flipkens leads 4–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Kirsten Flipkens won the 2018 Budapest third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kirsten Flipkens
BEL Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Monica Niculescu
ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 2018* Budapest WTA 250 R32 Hard Kirsten Flipkens #67 6-3 7-5 Monica Niculescu #75 Match data
Jan 13, 2017* Hobart WTA 250 R16 Hard Monica Niculescu #40 6-3 6-2 Kirsten Flipkens #73 Match data
Oct 19, 2016* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Monica Niculescu #51 6-4 6-2 Kirsten Flipkens #63 Match data
Apr 10, 2015* Katowice WTA 250 R16 Hard Kirsten Flipkens #70 6-7(6) 6-1 6-4 Monica Niculescu #62 Match data
Feb 12, 2015* Antwerp WTA 500 R32 Hard Monica Niculescu #57 6-3 6-2 Kirsten Flipkens #59 Match data
Mar 6, 2013* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kirsten Flipkens #31 4-6 6-4 6-3 Monica Niculescu #58 Match data
Jan 12, 2013* Hobart WTA 250 QF Hard Kirsten Flipkens #51 2-6 6-4 6-0 Monica Niculescu #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,829 198 221 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Monica Niculescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,498 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0
20 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,507 0 0 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,501 0 0 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0
23 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,587 0 0 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0
24 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,666 0 0 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0
25 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1
26 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,762 0 1 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2
27 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,734 0 1 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2
28 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,657 0 1 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3
29 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,657 0 1 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3
30 2016 21–20 51.2% #65 1,642 0 1 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3
31 2017 16–21 43.2% #74 1,695 0 1 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3
32 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,660 0 1 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3
33 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,747 0 1 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3
34 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,659 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,685 0 1 — — — — — — —