H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Kirsten Flipkens vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 1-1

Kirsten Flipkens and Pauline Parmentier are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pauline Parmentier leads 1–0 on clay, while Kirsten Flipkens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2016 Rabat third round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kirsten Flipkens
BEL Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Pauline Parmentier
FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 27, 2016* Rabat WTA 250 R32 Clay Pauline Parmentier #102 7-5 7-5 Kirsten Flipkens #58 Match data
Jan 4, 2013* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Kirsten Flipkens #54 6-2 6-2 Pauline Parmentier #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,829 198 221 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Pauline Parmentier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,498 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0
20 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,507 0 0 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,501 0 0 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2
23 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,587 0 0 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2
24 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,666 0 0 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2
25 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2
26 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,762 0 1 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2
27 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,734 0 1 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2
28 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,657 0 1 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2
29 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,657 0 1 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2
30 2016 21–20 51.2% #65 1,642 0 1 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2
31 2017 16–21 43.2% #74 1,695 0 1 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2
32 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,660 0 1 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4
33 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,747 0 1 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4
34 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4
35 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,659 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,685 0 1 — — — — — — —