H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Kirsten Flipkens vs Shuai Peng H2H: 0-2

Shuai Peng holds a 2–0 lead over Kirsten Flipkens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kirsten Flipkens
BEL Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Shuai Peng #20 6-0 6-4 Kirsten Flipkens #124 Match data
May 19, 2011* Brussels WTA 500 R32 Clay Shuai Peng #31 6-0 1-6 6-3 Kirsten Flipkens #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,829 198 221 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,498 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0
20 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,507 0 0 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,501 0 0 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,587 0 0 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0
24 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,666 0 0 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0
25 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0
26 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,762 0 1 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0
27 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,734 0 1 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0
28 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,657 0 1 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0
29 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,657 0 1 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2016 21–20 51.2% #65 1,642 0 1 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2017 16–21 43.2% #74 1,695 0 1 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,660 0 1 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,747 0 1 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2
35 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,659 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,685 0 1 — — — — — — —