H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kirsten Flipkens vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-1
Kirsten Flipkens and Tamira Paszek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kirsten Flipkens leads 1–0 on grass, while Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2016 Auckland quarterfinal 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data | Jan 9, 2016* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard |
| Kirsten Flipkens | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,830 | 200 | 222 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kirsten Flipkens | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |