H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC

Kristina Mladenovic vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 2-3

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 3–2 lead over Kristina Mladenovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Kristina Mladenovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kristina Mladenovic won the 2018 Madrid second round 7-5 6-0.

FRA Age 33 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 7, 2018 Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Kristina Mladenovic #22 7-5 6-0 Coco Vandeweghe #13 Match data
Sep 27, 2016* Wuhan WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kristina Mladenovic #54 7-6(5) 6-3 Coco Vandeweghe #32 Match data
Jun 12, 2016* S-Hertogenbosch WTA 250 F Grass Coco Vandeweghe #43 7-5 7-5 Kristina Mladenovic #32 Match data
Feb 18, 2016* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #46 7-5 3-6 6-4 Kristina Mladenovic #30 Match data
Oct 9, 2014* Osaka WTA 250 R32 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #38 6-2 6-3 Kristina Mladenovic #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kristina Mladenovic #395 #10 3,155 1,926 212 232 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristina Mladenovic Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 2009 0–4 0.0% #202 1,451 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2010 1–2 33.3% #300 1,460 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2011 0–1 0.0% #141 1,451 0 0 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0
19 2012 5–5 50.0% #96 1,512 0 0 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0
20 2013 21–25 45.7% #55 1,550 0 0 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0
21 2014 15–23 39.5% #67 1,599 0 0 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2015 35–25 58.3% #29 1,733 0 0 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2016 25–25 50.0% #42 1,720 0 0 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2017 34–25 57.6% #11 1,652 0 1 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2
25 2018 18–26 40.9% #43 1,656 0 1 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2
26 2019 27–23 54.0% #39 1,790 0 1 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2
27 2020 4–9 30.8% #50 1,717 0 1 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2
28 2021 20–23 46.5% #86 1,672 0 1 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2022 7–10 41.2% #152 1,561 0 1 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2
30 2023 0–4 0.0% #239 1,432 0 1 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2024 0–2 0.0% #210 1,442 0 1 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2