H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Jennifer Brady H2H: 1-1
Kristina Mladenovic and Jennifer Brady are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristina Mladenovic leads 1–0 on clay, while Jennifer Brady leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Brady won the 2019 Toronto second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2019* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 6-1 6-2 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| May 30, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kristina Mladenovic | 3-6 6-3 9-7 | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,942 | 72 | 76 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Mladenovic | Jennifer Brady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |