H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 1-0
Kristina Mladenovic holds a 1–0 lead over Urszula Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristina Mladenovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristina Mladenovic won the 2015 Tianjin fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kristina Mladenovic | 6-4 6-4 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Mladenovic | Urszula Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |