H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 1-0
Kristina Mladenovic holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristina Mladenovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kristina Mladenovic won the 2015 Strasbourg semifinal 6-3 1-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2015* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Kristina Mladenovic | 6-3 1-2 (ret.) | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,876 | 200 | 216 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Mladenovic | Virginie Razzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #58 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |