H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Yafan Wang H2H: 0-1
Yafan Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Mladenovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yafan Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yafan Wang won the 2019 Miami first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2019* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-3 6-3 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kristina Mladenovic | Yafan Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |