H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristyna Pliskova vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-2
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 2–0 lead over Kristyna Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2018 Australian Open first round 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2014* | Katowice | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-3 6-2 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristyna Pliskova | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |