H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kristyna Pliskova vs Na Lae Han H2H: 0-1
Na Lae Han holds a 1–0 lead over Kristyna Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Lae Han leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Lae Han won the 2017 Seoul third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2017* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Na Lae Han | 6-4 6-4 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Na Lae Han | #973 | #149 | 416 | 1,517 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kristyna Pliskova | Na Lae Han | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #256 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |