H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Kristyna Pliskova vs Simona Halep H2H: 0-3
Simona Halep holds a 3–0 lead over Kristyna Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Simona Halep leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2018 Madrid fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2018* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Simona Halep | 6-1 6-4 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Simona Halep | 6-4 6-4 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
| May 8, 2017 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Simona Halep | 6-1 6-2 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristyna Pliskova | Simona Halep | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 |
| 27 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 |
| 29 | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 |