H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Kurumi Nara vs Arantxa Parra Santonja H2H: 0-1
Arantxa Parra Santonja holds a 1–0 lead over Kurumi Nara in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arantxa Parra Santonja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Parra Santonja won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Arantxa Parra Santonja | 6-2 6-2 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kurumi Nara | Arantxa Parra Santonja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |