H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kurumi Nara vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 0-1
Jelena Dokic holds a 1–0 lead over Kurumi Nara in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2011 Kuala Lumpur fourth round 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2011* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kurumi Nara | Jelena Dokic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 |