H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kurumi Nara vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 0-1
Marion Bartoli holds a 1–0 lead over Kurumi Nara in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marion Bartoli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2009 Osaka fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2009* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-1 6-1 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kurumi Nara | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |