H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kurumi Nara vs Romina Oprandi H2H: 1-0
Kurumi Nara holds a 1–0 lead over Romina Oprandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kurumi Nara leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kurumi Nara won the 2014 Cincinnati second round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 40
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2014* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 6-0 6-2 | Romina Oprandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Romina Oprandi | #895 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,694 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kurumi Nara | Romina Oprandi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #256 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #114 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |