H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 1-0
Kveta Peschke holds a 1–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2002 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kveta Peschke | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |