H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lany Kaligis vs Janet Newberry H2H: 0-2
Janet Newberry holds a 2–0 lead over Lany Kaligis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1975 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 77
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-3 6-1 | Lany Kaligis | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1971* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-1 6-1 | Lany Kaligis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lany Kaligis | — | — | — | 1,534 | 24 | 76 | 24.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lany Kaligis | Janet Newberry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1969 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1970 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1971 | 3–18 | 14.3% | — | 1,365 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1972 | 3–15 | 16.7% | — | 1,382 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1973 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1974 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1975 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 |