H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lany Kaligis vs Nathalie Fuchs H2H: 1-0

Lany Kaligis holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Fuchs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lany Kaligis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lany Kaligis won the 1975 Bournemouth round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lany Kaligis
INA Age 77
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Fuchs
FRA Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lany Kaligis 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Fuchs Match data May 15, 1975* R32 Bournemouth WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lany Kaligis — — — 1,534 24 76 24.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Fuchs — — — 1,782 104 103 50.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lany Kaligis Nathalie Fuchs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,489 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 4–6 40.0% — 1,528 0 0
19 1968 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1972 21–21 50.0% — 1,626 0 1
20 1969 3–10 23.1% — 1,414 0 0 1973 28–24 53.8% — 1,682 0 3
21 1970 2–10 16.7% — 1,406 0 0 1974 19–15 55.9% — 1,772 0 4
22 1971 3–18 14.3% — 1,356 0 0 1975 11–16 40.7% — 1,630 0 4
23 1972 3–15 16.7% — 1,377 0 0 1976 7–8 46.7% — 1,629 0 4
24 1973 5–10 33.3% — 1,426 0 0 1977 2–2 50.0% — 1,634 0 4
25 1974 1–4 20.0% — 1,436 0 0 1978 10–5 66.7% — 1,633 0 4
26 1975 4–6 40.0% — 1,494 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,621 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,590 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lany Kaligis Nathalie Fuchs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 1968 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1972 — — — — 13 10 23 56.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1969 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1973 4 3 7 57.1% 14 11 25 56.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1970 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1971 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 13 16 18.8% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1973 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1974 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1978 — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — —
26 1975 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 4 4 0.0% 14 27 41 34.1% 10 44 54 18.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — 6 6 12 50.0% 66 57 123 53.7% 8 22 30 26.7% 12 12 24 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lany Kaligis Nathalie Fuchs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1489 103.7 — — — — — +24 — 25.0% -1.50 — — — +0.36
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1528 111.5 — — — — — +20 +25 38.1% -1.33 1–0 0–1 — 0.00
19 1968 1502 103.7 — — — — — — +31 46.7% -0.07 2–1 (67%) — — +0.42 1972 1626 127.8 — — — — -89 +40 -84 51.1% +0.14 5–5 (50%) 1–0 — +2.57
20 1969 1414 89.7 — — — — — +32 +30 26.9% -1.65 1–3 (25%) — — +1.43 1973 1683 125.2 — — — — -46 -23 -123 50.0% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 +5.03
21 1970 1407 106.3 — — — — — — +5 20.0% -2.24 0–1 1–0 — -0.38 1974 1772 129.2 — — — — -57 -3 -252 55.7% +0.37 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.31
22 1971 1357 97.4 — — — — — +45 -20 25.5% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.85 1975 1631 121.5 — — — — — +21 — 42.9% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.9 -0.41
23 1972 1377 112.1 — — — — +90 +56 -71 22.5% -1.98 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.88 1976 1629 120.9 — — — — — +34 — 50.0% +0.37 1–1 1–0 — +1.16
24 1973 1427 122.1 — — — — — +29 -115 41.7% -0.58 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 +0.03 1977 1635 106.0 — — — — +67 — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.66
25 1974 1436 97.5 — — — — — +26 — 33.3% -2.25 0–2 2–0 — -0.48 1978 1633 112.6 — — — — — +28 — 64.3% +1.00 — 1–1 — +2.09
26 1975 1494 117.3 — — — — — +66 -199 41.7% -0.71 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.48 1979 1622 99.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.01
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1591 95.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 — — +0.40
Career — 1534 109.5 — — — — +90 +43 -26 30.7% -1.47 8–23 (26%) 7–6 (54%) 94.2 +0.52 — 1783 127.4 — — — — -44 +14 -109 49.8% -0.04 25–19 (57%) 7–10 (41%) 100.8 +5.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.