H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lara Arruabarrena vs Annika Beck H2H: 2-0
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 2–0 lead over Annika Beck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lara Arruabarrena leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2014 Bastad fourth round 2-6 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2016 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Annika Beck | 6-1 4-6 3-1 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2014* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 2-6 6-4 7-6(2) | Annika Beck | Match data |
| Jul 10, 2014* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | Annika Beck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Annika Beck | #903 | #37 | 1,455 | 1,746 | 91 | 114 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lara Arruabarrena | Annika Beck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #178 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |