H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lara Arruabarrena vs Monica Puig H2H: 1-1
Lara Arruabarrena and Monica Puig are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lara Arruabarrena leads 1–0 on clay, while Monica Puig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2016 Tianjin fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2016* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Monica Puig | 6-4 6-2 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
| May 1, 2015* | Marrakech | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 7-5 6-2 | Monica Puig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lara Arruabarrena | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |