H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Laura Pigossi vs Sílvia Soler-Espinosa H2H: 0-1
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Pigossi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa won the 2014 Rio de Janeiro third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 31
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2016 | Rabat | WTA 250 | Q2 | Clay | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | 6-2 6-2 | Laura Pigossi | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2014* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | 6-0 6-1 | Laura Pigossi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Pigossi | #252 | #100 | 684 | 1,599 | 15 | 21 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Pigossi | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #429 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |