H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Pous-Tio vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 0-1

Anna Tatishvili holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Pous-Tio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Tatishvili leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Tatishvili won the 2006 Charleston Open round of 64 3-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Pous-Tio
Spain Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anna Tatishvili
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna Tatishvili #570 3-6 6-3 7-5 Laura Pous-Tio #81 Match data Apr 12, 2006* R64 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Pous-Tio #776 #72 930 1,620 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anna Tatishvili #1,071 #50 1,210 1,615 44 93 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Anna Tatishvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #1156 1,485 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #302 1,502 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–5 16.7% #285 1,456 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #160 1,444 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #177 1,423 0 0
20 2005 7–7 50.0% #90 1,542 0 0 2010 4–6 40.0% #134 1,467 0 0
21 2006 6–14 30.0% #101 1,497 0 0 2011 7–14 33.3% #89 1,493 0 0
22 2007 3–6 33.3% #165 1,465 0 0 2012 16–18 47.1% #51 1,602 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2013 4–18 18.2% #127 1,492 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2014 0–6 0.0% #146 1,438 0 0
25 2010 6–6 50.0% #108 1,529 0 0 2015 7–8 46.7% #101 1,507 0 0
26 2011 13–15 46.4% #75 1,589 0 0 2016 3–8 27.3% #200 1,464 0 0
27 2012 6–9 40.0% #157 1,545 0 0 2017 0–2 0.0% #516 1,445 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #998 1,436 0 0
30 2015 0–1 0.0% #194 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 0–4 0.0% #287 1,427 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Anna Tatishvili
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
21 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2012 8 7 15 53.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 10 10 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 2015 5 7 12 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 19 23 17.4% 37 40 77 48.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — 19 51 70 27.1% 20 32 52 38.5% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 71/89 of Laura Pous-Tio's and 120/136 of Anna Tatishvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Anna Tatishvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 5/5 0.2 7.2 60.9% 52.1% 37.1% 52.3% 41.0% 46.6% 43.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/6 1.8 4.3 63.6% 55.3% 44.7% 41.1% 36.9% 51.3% 41.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 2.0 10.0 58.4% 53.8% 35.1% 40.0% 66.7% 46.1% 45.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 1.5 5.5 65.3% 52.8% 35.6% 45.0% 41.5% 46.4% 44.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 10/10 0.4 4.5 72.1% 54.8% 41.7% 48.4% 43.7% 51.0% 42.6%
21 2006 12/20 1.1 3.2 65.7% 58.4% 48.6% 56.2% 41.7% 55.0% 43.2% 2011 21/21 0.8 3.9 71.3% 54.6% 40.0% 36.7% 46.6% 50.4% 44.2%
22 2007 6/9 1.3 5.2 58.3% 53.0% 43.7% 48.0% 63.9% 49.2% 46.9% 2012 31/34 1.6 4.4 67.1% 57.4% 43.7% 48.3% 51.0% 52.5% 43.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 18/22 0.9 4.4 63.5% 48.7% 39.9% 44.9% 44.2% 45.5% 40.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/6 1.0 5.4 61.0% 55.4% 33.5% 45.4% 28.9% 47.3% 38.0%
25 2010 7/12 0.6 2.1 71.6% 57.1% 53.3% 52.3% 57.3% 55.3% 46.4% 2015 9/15 1.2 1.8 69.7% 59.4% 47.1% 49.3% 53.9% 56.0% 43.1%
26 2011 27/28 0.7 2.5 67.4% 55.1% 47.8% 54.8% 53.1% 52.8% 46.5% 2016 11/11 1.7 5.0 64.2% 61.3% 45.2% 54.1% 42.5% 54.8% 39.2%
27 2012 14/15 0.6 3.1 59.3% 61.5% 43.4% 55.3% 52.5% 54.0% 47.9% 2017 2/2 0.5 5.5 59.2% 55.0% 28.8% 41.7% 23.1% 43.1% 29.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 58.5% 33.3% 17.6% 14.3% 20.0% 26.8% 38.5%
30 2015 1/1 0.0 2.0 64.4% 51.1% 61.5% 37.5% 50.0% 54.8% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 4/4 0.8 4.8 67.6% 54.9% 33.7% 40.6% 78.6% 48.2% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 71/103 0.8 3.0 65.1% 56.9% 46.7% 53.3% 53.8% 53.1% 45.8% — 120/137 1.1 4.4 66.7% 55.2% 41.4% 45.7% 45.5% 50.4% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Anna Tatishvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1486 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.05
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1503 107.1 -1.97 -1.16 0.819 45.5% +3 — — 33.3% -1.67 2–0 2–0 — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1457 98.2 -1.65 -2.40 0.853 46.6% +30 — — 26.7% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.24
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1445 99.5 +0.37 -0.11 0.846 45.9% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.07
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1423 97.5 -2.50 -0.92 0.822 45.3% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.08
20 2005 1542 107.3 — — — — -41 +77 — 46.9% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.14 2010 1467 106.2 -2.74 -1.42 0.870 46.8% -3 +70 — 37.5% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.24
21 2006 1498 111.5 -0.72 -1.49 0.959 49.2% -43 +76 — 36.2% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 0–1 — -0.11 2011 1493 109.7 -3.47 +0.38 0.892 47.4% -31 +21 +123 37.3% -0.92 4–5 (44%) 2–0 — -0.54
22 2007 1466 95.5 -3.89 -0.40 0.924 48.0% — +65 — 35.0% -0.80 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.71 2012 1603 121.9 -2.57 -0.58 0.917 48.2% -29 -66 +25 48.6% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.7 +1.20
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1492 109.8 -6.30 -0.93 0.743 43.1% -24 +61 — 27.5% -1.71 3–6 (33%) 0–6 (0%) 95.0 -1.42
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1438 99.1 -2.75 -1.09 0.721 41.8% -11 — — 0.0% -3.17 — 0–1 — -0.11
25 2010 1530 117.0 -0.15 +1.25 1.039 51.0% — +51 — 53.3% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.42 2015 1507 120.0 -1.39 +0.32 0.979 49.8% -24 +52 — 48.3% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.48
26 2011 1590 119.1 -2.29 +2.09 0.985 49.8% -126 +36 — 44.3% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 100.5 -0.55 2016 1465 99.1 -1.19 -1.79 0.868 47.1% -43 +61 +114 40.0% -1.12 1–4 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 +0.73
27 2012 1545 107.7 -1.22 -0.13 1.041 51.1% -104 +94 — 40.6% -0.56 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.78 2017 1445 96.1 -2.88 -0.25 0.510 37.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1436 97.6 -1.44 +0.62 0.526 33.3% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.08
30 2015 1531 100.6 -1.68 -0.81 0.759 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1428 94.0 -2.86 -3.40 0.805 45.3% -10 — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1414 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1621 111.6 -1.76 +0.40 0.977 49.6% -75 +62 — 41.2% -0.42 13–20 (39%) 8–15 (35%) 91.7 +0.75 — 1615 112.7 -3.01 -0.67 0.850 46.4% -21 +16 +80 36.5% -1.09 21–29 (42%) 15–17 (47%) 100.2 +0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.