H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laura Pous-Tio vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 0-1
Anna Tatishvili holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Pous-Tio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Tatishvili leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Tatishvili won the 2006 Charleston second round 3-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2006* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anna Tatishvili | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Laura Pous-Tio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Pous-Tio | #776 | #72 | 930 | 1,621 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Pous-Tio | Anna Tatishvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #75 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |