H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laura Pous-Tio vs Ekaterina Bychkova H2H: 1-0
Laura Pous-Tio holds a 1–0 lead over Ekaterina Bychkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Pous-Tio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Pous-Tio won the 2007 Bad Gastein third round 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2007* | Bad Gastein | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Laura Pous-Tio | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2 | Ekaterina Bychkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Pous-Tio | #776 | #72 | 930 | 1,621 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ekaterina Bychkova | #814 | #66 | 588 | 1,584 | 34 | 67 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Pous-Tio | Ekaterina Bychkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #70 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #76 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #117 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #181 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #75 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |