H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Pous-Tio vs Jamea Jackson H2H: 0-1

Jamea Jackson holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Pous-Tio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jamea Jackson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jamea Jackson won the 2006 Hobart International round of 32 6-4 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Pous-Tio
Spain Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jamea Jackson
USA Age 40 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jamea Jackson #93 6-4 2-6 6-4 Laura Pous-Tio #81 Match data Jan 12, 2006* R32 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Pous-Tio #776 #72 930 1,620 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jamea Jackson #382 #43 479 1,662 33 50 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Jamea Jackson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #444 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 2–5 28.6% #156 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 10–14 41.7% #80 1,520 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2006 19–19 50.0% #45 1,608 0 0
20 2005 7–7 50.0% #90 1,542 0 0 2007 0–6 0.0% #588 1,539 0 0
21 2006 6–14 30.0% #101 1,497 0 0 2008 2–5 28.6% #273 1,529 0 0
22 2007 3–6 33.3% #165 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2010 6–6 50.0% #108 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2011 13–15 46.4% #75 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 6–9 40.0% #157 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 0–1 0.0% #194 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 0–4 0.0% #287 1,427 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Jamea Jackson
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
20 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
22 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 19 23 17.4% 37 40 77 48.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — 20 37 57 35.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 71/89 of Laura Pous-Tio's and 40/82 of Jamea Jackson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Jamea Jackson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/7 0.0 4.0 64.0% 53.8% 44.4% 50.0% 36.8% 50.4% 44.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/24 1.1 2.4 66.3% 62.4% 42.0% 56.2% 56.0% 55.5% 45.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 20/38 0.7 3.1 66.5% 58.3% 48.9% 47.6% 44.4% 55.1% 45.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/6 0.4 4.0 62.9% 45.0% 40.0% 37.7% 28.9% 43.7% 32.8%
21 2006 12/20 1.1 3.2 65.7% 58.4% 48.6% 56.2% 41.7% 55.0% 43.2% 2008 5/7 1.2 4.4 62.5% 52.0% 37.3% 43.7% 55.6% 46.8% 40.2%
22 2007 6/9 1.3 5.2 58.3% 53.0% 43.7% 48.0% 63.9% 49.2% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 7/12 0.6 2.1 71.6% 57.1% 53.3% 52.3% 57.3% 55.3% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 27/28 0.7 2.5 67.4% 55.1% 47.8% 54.8% 53.1% 52.8% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 14/15 0.6 3.1 59.3% 61.5% 43.4% 55.3% 52.5% 54.0% 47.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1/1 0.0 2.0 64.4% 51.1% 61.5% 37.5% 50.0% 54.8% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 4/4 0.8 4.8 67.6% 54.9% 33.7% 40.6% 78.6% 48.2% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 71/103 0.8 3.0 65.1% 56.9% 46.7% 53.3% 53.8% 53.1% 45.8% — 40/83 0.8 3.2 65.5% 56.7% 44.7% 47.9% 46.3% 52.6% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Pous-Tio Jamea Jackson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1492 100.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1483 106.1 -0.74 -0.28 0.892 47.5% -1 — — 46.7% -0.07 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1521 117.6 -0.08 -0.13 1.020 50.4% -39 — +118 43.6% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.8 -0.78
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1609 128.7 -0.56 +0.41 1.005 50.0% -63 -80 +192 53.5% +0.27 6–8 (43%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.35
20 2005 1542 107.3 — — — — -41 +77 — 46.9% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.14 2007 1540 95.2 -4.69 -3.50 0.583 38.5% -33 — — 7.7% -3.54 0–1 — — -0.44
21 2006 1498 111.5 -0.72 -1.49 0.959 49.2% -43 +76 — 36.2% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 0–1 — -0.11 2008 1530 101.3 -3.99 -0.29 0.755 43.5% -25 — — 28.6% -2.21 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
22 2007 1466 95.5 -3.89 -0.40 0.924 48.0% — +65 — 35.0% -0.80 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1530 117.0 -0.15 +1.25 1.039 51.0% — +51 — 53.3% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 1590 119.1 -2.29 +2.09 0.985 49.8% -126 +36 — 44.3% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 100.5 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1545 107.7 -1.22 -0.13 1.041 51.1% -104 +94 — 40.6% -0.56 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1531 100.6 -1.68 -0.81 0.759 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1428 94.0 -2.86 -3.40 0.805 45.3% -10 — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1414 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1621 111.6 -1.76 +0.40 0.977 49.6% -75 +62 — 41.2% -0.42 13–20 (39%) 8–15 (35%) 91.7 +0.75 — 1662 120.0 -1.40 -0.31 0.907 47.8% -44 -80 +164 44.3% -0.45 9–18 (33%) 8–12 (40%) 96.4 -1.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.