H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laura Robson vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 1-0
Laura Robson holds a 1–0 lead over Edina Gallovits Hall in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Robson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Robson won the 2013 Shenzhen third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 32
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 41
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2013* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Robson | 6-2 6-1 | Edina Gallovits Hall | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Robson | #764 | #27 | 1,685 | 1,708 | 38 | 62 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Edina Gallovits Hall | — | — | — | 1,642 | 50 | 80 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Robson | Edina Gallovits Hall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #517 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #217 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #44 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #916 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #222 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |